|
|
|
|
|
1. William Shakespeare,
the most popular playwright of all time, experiments with comedy, mystery,
betrayal, romance, and tragedy in his play, Hamlet, Prince of Denmark.
The author uses a variety of characters from different social backgrounds
to give us an elaborate picture of deception. From the opening line of
"Who’s there?" the reader gets the impression that people are not what
they seem in this play. The interrelationships between the royalty and
people of the court are well-developed to illustrate the major and minor
similarities and differences between the characters. Shakespeare reveals
the deceptive nature of man and the ruin it causes through his use of foils.
[Many of the other essays did not follow the directions
and used the definition of foils as the introduction. This writer understood
that the essay was to be about the use of foils in the play. The introduction,
therefore, is about the play, and it leads up to a thesis which briefly
states the function (meaning) of the foils within the play. The thesis,
in other words, does not simply state that the essay will discuss foils
in the play, but rather that the essay will show how the foils help reveal
the deceptive nature of man and the resulting ruin. This is, I believe,
also the only writer who alludes to "Who's there?" and thereby nicely connects
the essay -- and thus the foils -- to much of what I emphasized in class
discussions of the play.]
2. Foils are integral to this
play, because many of the devious plots are revealed to the reader through
them. A foil is a secondary character which [*1]
illuminates certain things about a primary character to the audience.
The major character may reveal secrets, such as murderous plots or traps,
or feelings, for example, a perspective on death or the love of another
character. This can happen if the minor character is primarily a listener
on stage. Another scenario is if two characters, major and minor, share
similarities, but have distinct differences. These variations in personality
will reveal something important about the main character. The "something
important" could be a fatal flaw or a good point of their personality.
Many foils are used in this play, but there are two important ones which
happen to be for the same character. [This is the
best definition of foils in the entire set of papers. It uses the basic
concepts that my definition included, but it develops them through its
own examples.]
3. Laertes is a foil for Hamlet and their deceptions are quite painful to all involved. Laertes and Hamlet are approximately the same age and the same sex. [*2] They also both live abroad, France and Germany, respectively. Laertes and Hamlet both deeply love in different ways a maiden named Ophelia. Ophelia is Laertes’ sister and receives advice from him about Hamlet. Hamlet proclaims his love and lust for Ophelia many times throughout the play. [Where in the play does he proclaim his lust for her?] For example, on page 659, [Citation] Polonius reads to the king and queen a love letter from Hamlet which states, "Doubt truth to be a liar, but never doubt I love." [This says "love," not "lust"; shame on you.] Laertes tells Ophelia that Hamlet does not love her, that she is just a passing fancy to the prince. Hamlet and Laertes both have meddling parents. Polonius, Laertes’ father, sends his servant, Reynaldo, to spy on his son. Besides spying, Reynaldo is to spread rumors to obtain truths about Laertes. Hamlet’s parents, Queen Gertrude and King Claudius, have servants spy on him, trick him to determine [the] cause of supposed madness, and badger him in his time of mourning. Instead of just asking Hamlet, they use Ophelia as bait to see if he really loves her.
4. But the major similarity between these two is their own deceptiveness. Hamlet pretends to be mad and acts despicably towards Ophelia. He also sets up a fake play to see the king’s reaction instead of confronting him as soon as he knew the truth. Hamlet also writes letters under the king’s name to put to death two soldiers, Rosencrantz and Guildernstern. Laertes[,] when learning that Hamlet was the murderer of his father[,] agrees to trick Hamlet into a duel. Laertes and King Claudius sabotage the sword by removing the button which would prevent the sword from cutting through the skin and by poisoning the tip. Laertes also knew about the poisoned wine Hamlet was to drink. Hamlet's deceit caused Ophelia's death and complications in his plan of revenge. Laertes’ deceptive tricks killed Hamlet, the queen, and himself. [This is an excellently detailed paragraph.]
5. Laertes and Hamlet have differences as well as similarities. Laertes is the king's servant's son, whereas Hamlet is the next in succession to be king. A major differing aspect is their treatment of the new king. Laertes obeys and collaborates with King Claudius. Hamlet disdains and ridicules the king on behalf of his wronged mother and murdered father. Also Laertes immediately called for blood when learning of his father's murder, yet after Hamlet talks to the ghost of his dead father, he delays revenge. Even though given many opportunities, [no ,] to slay Claudius, Hamlet refrains. Yet when Laertes sees Hamlet, the murderer of Polonius, he starts a brawl at his sister's funeral. Hamlet's obsession with tricking Claudius results in the unnecessary deaths of Polonius and Ophelia. Laertes’ deceit causes the Queen and Hamlet to die, as well as himself. [The last part of this paragraph repeats the preceding paragraph.]
6. As a listener on stage, Laertes learns of other's deceptions and consents to his own. Polonius gives words of wisdom to his son, even though he does not follow his own advice. The hypocrisy of Polonius is quite evident in this speech, which includes the ever popular line, ". . . to thine own self be true." Laertes also is taken into the king's confidence and agrees to plot against Hamlet. He is crucial to the plan because the final tragedy illustrates how the deviant nature of man causes destruction to people's lives. [*3]
7. Hamlet, being the main character in this play, has more than one foil to illustrate the devious nature of man. Horatio is the only character who knows of the plots and traps and does not interfere. He knows of the lies and secrets of Denmark, yet remains in the background to let, [No ,] "Heaven direct it." He is the same age and sex as Hamlet, and they both attend the same university in Germany. Horatio is the only one that Hamlet trusts. This is very important to Horatio’s role as a listener. [Nice. I don't think anyone else mentioned this.] Hamlet tells Horatio of the ghost's secret, his own devious act of pretending to be mad, the plot of the king to have Hamlet killed, and Hamlet's retaliation against the king. Hamlet's confiding to Horatio lets the audience hear the secrets of the court.
8. Hamlet uses his intelligence to deceive every person in Elsinore, except Horatio. Horatio acts as the straight and narrow of the palace. He is the only character the audience trusts and his loyalty is quite evident. In the final scene, Hamlet is dying and Horatio attempts to take his own life, but Hamlet stops him. Horatio is the noble and non-devious character who is spared, so he may tell the story. He, the only one who did not enter into devious plans, survives because he is good. Horatio is ever-important as a listener on stage. As Hamlet's best friend, he tells him of the ghost. Hamlet makes him swear to not divulge the details of his father's death. Through Hamlet and Horatio’s conversations, the audience learns of the assassination attempt on Hamlet and how he eludes his captors. The audience also learns of Hamlet's death order on Rosencrantz and Guildernstern. Horatio is with whom Hamlet ponders death while they are in the graveyard. Their conversation reveals Hamlet's sensitive side. Horatio also witnesses the final scene and will tell the people of Denmark the deception and murder which occurred in Elsinore. [Paragraphs 7 and 8 are somewhat repetitive and could have been better organized.]
9. Shakespeare is an expert at manipulating language to allow readers to observe the different sides of man. In Hamlet, Prince of Denmark, the deception and betrayal between characters is made very clear. Foils in plays are an adept way to show variations of personality. Horatio, Laertes, and Hamlet are adequate [?] examples of different personalities. Shakespeare used Horatio and Laertes to reveal plots of the play and the devious ways of the other characters. Hamlet, Prince of Denmark is a play that can be used to examine the effects of deceit. Man's tendency towards deceiving others is a flaw which causes emotional and[,] in this play[,] physical pain. This play reflects the destruction of innocent lives because of the lack of honesty.
1. Normally, "which" and "that" are best used to refer to a thing; "who" is used to refer to a person. [Click here.] In this case, a character is not a real person, but it does represent a person. I would probably have used "that."
2. "Laertes and Hamlet are approximately the same age and the same sex. " Many readers will carry the "approximately" here over the "and" and thus apply it to "same sex." Then they will start to wonder about how people can be "approximately the same sex." For many people, this is an interesting question which they may ponder for some time. As that time goes by, however, their eyes will continue to read words. Hence they may miss what the writer says in the next few sentences. The problem can be avoided by changing the sequence: "Laertes and Hamlet are the same sex and approximately the same age."
3. Paragraph six, on Laertes as listener, is weak, but I blame the assignment, particularly the grading sheets for the weakness. The detailed grading sheets are intended to help weaker students develop their essays, but, as I have said in class, they get in the way of stronger students. In this paragraph this writer was attempting to get the three points under details designated for the first foil as a listener. (See below.)
|
I. Introduction and Thesis: Shakespeare reveals the deceptive nature
of man and the ruin it causes through his use of foils.
II. Foils III. Laertes for Hamlet
B. Differences C. Listener
B. Differences C. Listener |
Possible
Points |
Student's
Grading |
Instructor's
Grading |
Description | Totals |
Audience (20) |
|
|||
0 - 5 | 5 | 5 | The essay has a good introductory paragraph. | |
0 - 5 | 4 | 5 | The essay includes a brief definition (not in the introduction) of foils, such that a student who had not previously heard the term would understand both the concept and this essay. | |
0 - 5 | 5 | 5 | The essay does not simply retell the play. | |
0 - 5 |
|
|
The essay has a good concluding paragraph. | |
Thesis (20) | 17 / 20 | |||
0 - 4 | 4 | 4 | The thesis is recognizable, somewhere near the beginning of the essay. | |
0 - 4 |
|
|
The thesis and essay reflect good, independent thought about Hamlet. [The discussion of Laertes relation to the plot is particularly nice. You've made me rethink the concept of foils.] | |
0 - 4 | 3 | 4 | The thesis and essay reflect at least an average understanding of foils. | |
0 - 4 | 4 | 4 | The essay reflects at least an average understanding of foils in Hamlet. | |
0 - 4 | 3 | 4 | The essay reflects an above average understanding of foils in Hamlet. | |
Organization (20) |
|
|||
0 - 4 |
|
|
Topic sentences relate paragraphs to the thesis. | |
0 - 4 |
|
|
Paragraphs are generally eight to ten sentences long. | |
0 - 4 |
|
|
Major and minor points in the outline are logically arranged. [See the note above on paragraphs 7 & 8.] | |
0 - 4 |
|
|
The essay is accompanied by a typed formal outline with subdivisions to the level of capital letters, i.e., II B. The paragraphs in the essay have been numbered and the numbers of the paragraphs have been placed in parentheses next to the corresponding part of the outline. | |
0 - 4 |
|
|
Paragraphs reflect subdivisions of major points. (For example, more than one paragraph is devoted to a single foil.) |
Possible
Points |
Student's
Grading |
Instructor's
Grading |
Description | Totals |
Details (20) (Please fill
in the blanks.)
[Note: This rubric assumes that you will discuss at least two foils and be graded on the two you choose. You may discuss only one foil and use the same grades for both sections of this form.] |
|
|||
0 - 3 |
|
|
An explanation of similarities establishes __Laertes____ as a foil to ______Hamlet__________. | |
0 - 3 |
|
|
The differences between foil #1 (above) and __Hamlet____ and their significance to the play are explained in detail. | |
0 - 3 |
|
|
The function of foil # 1 as a listener on stage (and its significance to the play) is explained in detail. [As I look back at what I did, I would give this a 1.] | |
0 - 1 |
|
|
The relevance of foil # 1 to the thesis is explained in detail. | |
0 - 3 |
|
|
An explanation of similarities establishes ___Horatio ___ as a foil to ____Hamlet_. | |
0 - 3 |
|
|
The differences between foil #2 (above) and __Hamlet___ and their significance to the play are explained in detail. | |
0 - 3 |
|
|
The function of foil # 2 as a listener on stage (and its significance to the play) is explained in detail. [As I look back at what I did, I would give this a 3.] | |
0 - 1 |
|
|
The relevance of foil # 1 to the thesis is explained in detail. |
Possible
Points |
Student's
Grading |
Instructor's
Grading |
Description | Totals |
Style (20) |
|
|||
0 - 3 | 3 | 3 | Words are used correctly and accurately. | |
0 - 2 | 3 | 2 | There are no (few) errors in usage. | |
0 - 2 | 3 | 2 | Pronouns are used correctly. | |
0 - 2 | 3 | 2 | Verb forms and tenses are used correctly. | |
0 - 3 | 3 | 3 | All sentences are comprehensible. | |
0 - 2 | 2 | 2 | Sentence structure is mature and varied. | |
0 - 3 |
|
|
There are no (few) sloppy errors. | |
0 - 3 |
|
|
Punctuation marks are used correctly. | |
Minus Style Penalty Points (May be regained by correcting errors) |
|
|||
Basic Grade for the Essay (100) | 96 / 95 | |||
Penalty Points: - __________ Late -___________ Other | - | |||
Bonus points (6 possible) |
|
|||
0 - 2 |
|
|
Brainstorming | |
0 - 2 |
|
|
Outlining | |
0 - 2 |
|
|
Revision | |
Final Grade for the Essay | 96 / 100 | |||
Hostage Fifty: |
Student's Comments: (You can also use the back of either
page.)
NOTE: Revising = RV. Remember: use only one code per entry. (See Instructions.)
I used a word-processor _____while drafting __x___ while revising __x___
to type my paper.
Date: | Code | Started | Stopped | Minutes | Comments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[Grrrr] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[Grrrr] |
|
|
|
|
|
[Grrrr] |
Process | Minutes | % of Total |
Brainstorming |
45
|
6
|
Read/Research |
0
|
0
|
Outlining |
125
|
18
|
Tutoring Center |
0
|
0
|
Drafting |
360
|
52
|
Revising |
75
|
11
|
Editing |
45
|
6
|
Grading |
0
|
0
|
Typing |
45
|
6
|
Total |
695
|
= 11.6 hours |