This document is part of a study, conducted by Ed Vavra, of the syntax of students' writing.
Student's Text: | Comments: |
\-\The supervisor has no right to reprimanded the two woman. \-\They have the right to wear [whatever they want,] as along [as it is not too far u.] \-\Just [because they chose to wear a skirt {above their knees}] they should not have been reprimanded. \-\The men can wear [whatever they want] [so why can't the woman.] \-\The supervisor should not be concerned {with [what the women are wearing,]} \,\he should be concerned {about making a deal.} \-\What [if the person [they are trying to make the deal with] was a women,] and [the person [that was proposing the deal] was a man] and [he was wearing colone [which the women liked.]] \-\And the woman was attracted {to him} {because of the colone} \-\and it distracted her {from working.} \-\Would the woman supervisor reprimand the man {for wearing the colone.} \-\The case [we have here] is sexual harassment plain and simple. | [sic][sic] [sic]
See comma-splices.
[sic] [sic]
|
Raw Data |
Calculated Data |
Number
of words = 151 Number of paragraphs = 1 # of Prepositional Phrases = 7 # of Sub Clauses Level
1 = 10 # of Sub Clauses Level 2 = 3 # of Sub Clauses Level 3 = 0 # of Sub Clauses Level 4= 0 # of Fragments = 0 # of S/V Agr Errors = 0 |
Words
per main clause = 13.7 Prep Phrases / Main Clause = .64 % of words in P Phrases = 17 Total Sub Clauses / Main Cl = 1.18 Sub Clauses Level 2+ / MC = .27
Words per paragraph = 151.0 Main clauses per paragraph = 11.0 |
Unanalyzed Text:
The supervisor has no right to reprimanded the two woman. They have the right to wear whatever they want, as along as it is not too far u. Just because they chose to wear a skirt above their knees they should not have been reprimanded. The men can wear whatever they want so why can't the woman. The supervisor should not be concerned with what the women are wearing, he should be concerned about making a deal. What if the person they are trying to make the deal with was a women, and the person that was proposing the deal was a man and he was wearing colone which the women liked. And the woman was attracted to him because of the colone and it distracted her from working. Would the woman supervisor reprimand the man for wearing the colone. The case we have here is sexual harassment plain and simple.