A Freshman's Comments on his High-School Instruction in Writing
During the first week of Freshman comp, before I have done any instruction, I give students thirty to forty minutes to write an in-class essay. This semester (Fall of 97), the assignment was:
Write an essay about one of the following:
the Internet
writing
Capitalism
religion
democracy
The assignment has two primary purposes -- revalidating our placement exams and giving me a sense of what the students do and do not know about writing. Primarily, I look at sentence structure, the thesis sentence, paragraphing, and the student's sense of details. Having done this for more than twenty years, I can't say that I'm ever disappointed by what I find. In fact, more of my students are arriving with a better grasp of writing fundamentals. I am, however, disturbed by how, in my view, many of my students have been cheated. Consider the following "essay," submitted by a student this semester, and reproduced with his permission.
Writing I am not very good at writing. I
barely ever have to write anything. The most I write is probably my name.
I only ever wrote about five to eight papers in my whole four years of
highschool. They never had to be very long and they could be about whatever
I felt like writing about. When I wrote those papers I always seemed
to get a pretty good grade; but I still feel like I do not know how
to write. |
This student has a very accurate sense of his writing abilities. Perhaps,
one of these days, I will have the time to put a whole set of these
papers here on the net so that an "essay" like this could be
seen in the context of all the essays wriiten for the assignment. This
student has a good sense of basic sentence structure.The misspelling of
"know" and "where" bother me. Business English and
Business Communications courses flourish at the college level in part because
employers do not appreciate the inability to spell such common words. Did
his high school teachers simply ignore this problem?
What really bothers me about the essay, however,
are its egocentrism, its paragraph structure, and the relative lack of
details. My students have to go on to write essays about diesel engines,
forestry, dental hygiene, plastics, etc. Many of my incoming students gave
me essays in which they attempted to make a point about religion, writing,
capitalism, etc. They did not center their essays on themselves. But then,
this student was, as he says, allowed to write about whatever he wanted.
Now, however, he finds himself behind his classmates.
Two paragraphs do not make an essay.
Although this student's paragraphs are, as they should be, about two different
topics, there is no introduction, no clear thesis, and no real conclusion.
The distinction between the paragraphs, moreover, is rather simplistic:
back in high school vs. now in college. Compared to many members of the
class, this student has A LOT to learn about organizing an essay.
On the other hand, he is ahead of half of the class -- they handed in an
"essay" that consisted of a single paragraph.
"[F]ive to eight papers" is the
only detail that this writer gives us. That is, I should note, better than
what some of the students were able to produce. But it's not much. What
courses were the papers for? What were some of them about? What comments
did the teacher make? What grades did he get? [A "pretty good"
grade is not a very specific detail.] The topics about which he could have
written were intentionally broad because, in my experience, students who
have been well taught automatically find some way to get to details. Some
students, for example, mentioned specific web sites or listservers. Others,
who chose to write about religion, discussed specific rituals, beliefs,
etc.
Although I have been suggesting that
this student has a lot of catching up to do, what strikes me most in what
he wrote is his statement, "I still feel like I do not know how
to write." I may be wrong, but the high school writing that this student
describes sounds very much like what many high school teachers on NCTE-Talk
(the listserver of the National Council of Teachers of English) pride themselves
on doing. They take pride in letting students write on topics that the
students choose. They take pride in giving positive reinforcement ("pretty
good grades"). They argue against teaching the "five-paragraph
essay," claiming that it cramps students' creativity. And they claim
that their approach makes their students better, more confident writers.
I recently posed a question on the
list-server about teaching organization. Only one person responded. That
is not much response compared to the sixty or more responses that are evoked
by questions about reading topics, about teaching specific works of literature,
etc. Are high school teachers interested in teaching students how to organize
an essay? Obviously some are, and they are doing a good job. Their students
are also in my class. And they will have an easy time in my class (and
in other college classes), thanks to their high school teachers.