Finding Clauses
Practice Exercise # 11
Directions: [Work through the text one sentence at a time.]
1. First place parentheses ( ) around every prepositional phrase.
2. Underline every subject once, every finite verb twice, and label
complements (PA, PN, IO or DO). [Reminder: A predicate adjective describes
the subject; a predicate noun "equals" the subject; an indirect object
is someone or thing "to" or "for" whom (or what) the action of the verb
is performed. Any other complement has to be a direct object.]
The text is: |
A little boy was in a
relative's wedding. As he was coming down the aisle, he would take two
steps, stop, and turn to the crowd. While facing the crowd, he would put
his hands up like claws and roar. So it went, step, step, ROAR, step, step,
ROAR, all the way down the aisle. As you can imagine, the crowd was near
tears from laughing so hard by the time he reached the pulpit. The little
boy, however, was getting more and more distressed from all the laughing,
and was also near tears by the time he reached the pulpit. When asked what
he was doing, the child sniffed and said, "I was being the Ring Bear." |
Note: In creating these pages, I cannot create a double underline.
I will therefore underline both subjects and finite verbs once, but subjects
will be in green; finite verbs in blue. |
Work your way through the text one sentence
at a time. |
Sentence # 1
Sentence # 2
The second sentence is: |
As hewas
coming (down the aisle),
hewould
take two steps(DO),
stop,
and turn(to
the crowd). |
With more than one S/V/C pattern, we usually start at the
end and work backward, but we also need to keep an eye open for subordinate
conjunctions. "As" is one, so we have a clause beginning with
"As." "Down the aisle" goes with this clause because it tells where he
"was coming." But the next word, "he," is the subject in a different pattern.
Thus we have a clause that begins with "As" and ends with "aisle."
Is it subordinate or main? To answer
that, we need to see if it chunks to something outside itself. In this
case the "as" means that "he was coming" at the same time that "he would
take two steps." The "As" thus chunks this subordinate clause to "would
take." |
[Adv. to "would take"
As hewas
coming (down the aisle),]hewould
take two steps(DO),
stop,
and turn(to
the crowd). |
Because "would take," "stop," and "turn" all share the same subject,
they are all part of the same pattern. Thus, down to one unanalyzed
pattern, all we need to do is to put a vertical line at the end
of the sentence. We are finished with it.
[Remember that, because a clause is an S/V/C pattern and all the words
that chunk to it, the main clause begins with "As" and ends with "crowds."]
|
[Adv. to "would take"
As hewas
coming (down the aisle),]hewould
take two steps(DO),
stop,
and turn (to
the crowd)./ |
Sentence # 3
Sentence # 4
The fourth sentence is: |
So itwent,
step, step, ROAR, step, step, ROAR, all the way (down
the aisle). |
With only one S/V/C pattern, we can simply put a line at the
end of the sentence. |
So itwent,
step, step, ROAR, step, step, ROAR, all the way (down
the aisle)./ |
Sentence # 5
The fifth sentence is: |
As youcan
imagine, the crowdwas(near
tears) (from laughing so hard) (by the time) hereached
the pulpit(DO). |
That "As" at the beginning of the sentence is rather obvious
as the beginning of a subordinate clause. That subordinate clause ends
with the word "imagine," since "the" clearly goes to "crowd," a subject
in a different pattern. We need to look at what this clause chunks to.
Traditional grammars would say that it is adverbial to "was," but I would
also accept an interpretation which considers it as an
interjection. [In this clause, the writer is commenting to the reader
about the nature of the "crowd was" statement; he is not "modifying" the
way in which the crowd "was."] |
[Adverb to "was"
or Interjection As youcan
imagine,]
the crowdwas(near
tears) (from laughing so hard) (by the time) hereached
the pulpit(DO). |
We still have two unanalyzed patterns, so we begin at the end,
with "he reached." This clause obviously ends with "pulpit."
To find the first word in this clause, we need to look at the word
before the subject "he." The word "time" is in the prepositional phrase,
"by the time," that they phrase tells when the crowd was near tears."
Thus the phrase chunks to "was." Thus the first word in the last clause
is "he."
Is this clause subordinate or main?
Does it chunk to something outside itself? This clause tells us what "time"
the writer was talking about, so the clause chunks to "time." |
[Adverb to "was"
or Interjection As youcan
imagine,]
the crowdwas(near
tears) (from laughing so hard) (by the time)[Adjective
to "time" hereached
the pulpit(DO).
] |
We are now down to one unanalyzed S/V/C pattern ("crowd was"),
so we can put a line at the end of the sentence. We are finished
with it. [Note: The interjection is "thrown in" to the sentence, and counts
as part of the main clause, and, since a clause is an S/V/C pattern and
all the words that chunk to it, the "he reached" clause is also part of
the main clause.] |
[Adverb to "was"
or Interjection As youcan
imagine,]
the crowdwas
(near tears) (from laughing so hard) (by the time)[Adjective
to "time" hereached
the pulpit(DO).
]/ |
Sentence # 6
The sixth sentence is: |
The little boy,
however, was getting more and
more distressed(from
all the laughing), and was
also (near tears) (by the time)hereached
the pulpit(DO). |
In this sentence, we find the same "he reached the pulpit" clause modifying
"time." |
The little boy,
however, was getting more and
more distressed(from
all the laughing), and was
also (near tears) (by the time)[Adjective
to "time"hereached
the pulpit(DO).] |
The verbs "was getting distressed" and "was" share the same subject
("boy"), and are thus part of the same pattern. Since that is the only
pattern left, all we need to do is to put a vertical line at the
end of the sentence. |
The little boy,
however, was getting more and
more distressed(from
all the laughing), and was
also (near tears) (by the time)[Adjective
to "time"hereached
the pulpit(DO).]/ |
Sentence # 7
The seventh and last sentence is: |
When asked what(DO
of "was doing")hewas
doing, the childsniffed
and said, "Iwas
being the Ring Bear(PN)." |
With more than one S/V/C pattern, begin at the end and work backward.
The last pattern obviously ends with "Bear." The first
word in this pattern has to be the "I," because "said" is a finite
verb in a different pattern. Thus we have a clause that begins with "I"
and ends with "Bear."
Is it subordinate or main? Does it
chunk to a word in the sentence outside itself? The first word to look
at is always the word right in front of it. In this case that word is "said,"
and it shouldn't be very difficult to realize that the clause answers the
question "said what?" Thus the clause is the complement (DO) of "said." |
When asked what(DO
of "was doing")hewas
doing, the childsniffed
and said, [DO
of "said""Iwas
being the Ring Bear(PN)."] |
Now things get a bit tricky, and I expect most students in this course
to have problems with the rest of this sentence.
If we continue working backward, the
next pattern is based on "child sniffed and said." Because we just figured
out that the "I was being" clause is the complement of "said," we know
that the "child sniffed and said" clause ends with the word "Bear."
But where does it begin? The word "the" before "child" obviously goes with
"child." The "was doing" in front of it clearly is part of another S/V/C
pattern. Rather than trying to figure out what the "was doing" goes to,
let's not forget our other tool, subordinate conjunctions.
The "When" at the beginning of the sentence
can function as a subordinate conjunction, and "When asked" here means
"When *he was* asked . . ." Thus we are dealing with a semi-reduced
clause. The verb in this clause is "was asked," and the subject
is the understood "he." The first word is obviously the "When,"
but what is the last word? Is there a complement of "asked"? If
we ask "When he was asked what?", the answer is "what he was doing." Thus
"what he was doing is the complement of "asked." Technically, it is a retained
direct object, after the passive verb "was asked," but since we do
not study passive verbs in this course, I would expect you, if you were
able to get this far, to call it simply a direct object. We thus have a
clause that begins at "When" and ends at "doing."
Is this clause subordinate or main? The subordinate
conjunction ("When") indicates that it is subordinate. What does it chunk
to? "When" indicates a temporal relationship (Hume's
"extension"), between his being asked and "sniffed and said." Thus
the clause functions as an adverb to "sniffed and said." |
[Adverbial to "sniffed
and said" When *hewas*
askedwhat(DO
of "was doing") hewas
doing,]
the childsniffed
and said, [DO
of "said""Iwas
being the Ring Bear(PN)."] |
We still have a problem, however, because we have two S/V/C patterns
("he was asked" and "he was doing") within the set of brackets. But since
we have already noted that "what he was doing" is the complement of "was
asked," and since "what he was doing" is itself a clause, we can conclude
that it is a subordinate clause, functioning, as I noted, as a (retained)
direct object. |
[Adverbial to "sniffed
and said" When *hewas*
asked[(Retained)
DO of "was asked"what(DO
of "was doing") hewas
doing,]]
the childsniffed
and said, [DO
of "said""Iwas
being the Ring Bear(PN)."] |
We are now down to one unanalyzed pattern ("child sniffed and
said ..."), so we can put a vertical line at the end of the sentence. |
[Adverbial to "sniffed
and said" When *hewas*
asked[(Retained)
DO of "was asked"what(DO
of "was doing") hewas
doing,]]
the childsniffed
and said, [DO
of "said""Iwas
being the Ring Bear(PN)."] / |
If the preceding explanation still seems confusing, don't worry
about it. As I said, in this course I would not expect you to get
all of it. In effect, this sentence, with four clauses, is comparable
to bench-pressing 400 pounds. No weight lifter can do that without first
having pressed, hundreds of times, lighter weights. When you become accustomed
to analyzing the clause structure of less complex sentences, sentences
like this one will fall into place. |
|