Finding Clauses
Practice Exercise # 3
Directions: [Work through the text one sentence at a time.]
1. First place parentheses ( ) around every prepositional phrase.
2. Underline every subject once, every finite verb twice, and label
complements (PA, PN, IO or DO). [Reminder: A predicate adjective describes
the subject; a predicate noun "equals" the subject; an indirect object
is someone or thing "to" or "for" whom (or what) the action of the verb
is performed. Any other complement has to be a direct object.]
The text is: |
A Sunday school class was studying
the Ten Commandments. They were ready to discuss the last one. The teacher
asked if anyone could tell her what it was. Susie raised her hand, stood
tall, and quoted, "Thou shall not take the covers off the neighbor's wife." |
Note: In creating these pages, I cannot create a double underline.
I will therefore underline both subjects and finite verbs once, but subjects
will be in green; finite verbs in blue. |
Sentence #1
Work your way through
the text one sentence at a time. The first sentence is: |
A Sunday school
classwas
studying the Ten Commandments (DO).
/ |
Because there is only one S/V/C pattern,
put
a vertical line at the end of the sentence. We are finished with it. |
Sentence #2
The second sentence is: |
They wereready
(PA)
to discuss the last one. / |
Because there is only one S/V/C pattern, put
a vertical line at the end of the sentence. We are finished with it. |
Sentence #3
The third sentence is: |
The teacherasked
if anyonecould
tell her
(IO)what
(PN
of "was") itwas. |
Because there is more than one S/V/C pattern,
we need to start with the last one and work backwards. The
finite verb in the last pattern is "was." The subject is "it," and the
complement is "what." The last word in this clause is obviously
"was." To find the first word, we need to look at the word
before "what." Is "her" part of this clause, or does it go to a different
S/V/C pattern? Since "her" is the indirect object of "could tell," it clearly
goes to a different pattern. Thus we have identified "what it was" as a
clause.
Next we need to determine
whether it is a main or a subordinate clause. Does it "chunk
to" a word outside itself? A little thought should indicate that it answers
the question "should tell her what?" That means that this clause is the
direct object of "should tell," and, functioning as a direct object, it
has to be a subordinate clause. |
The teacherasked
if anyonecould
tell her
(IO)[DO
of "could tell" what
itwas.] |
Move (backward) to the next pattern, which is
based on the verb "could tell." Because a clause is a subject / finite
verb / complement pattern and all the words that chunk to it, this clause
includes the "what it was" clause which functions as its complement. The
last word in the "could tell" clause is thus "was."
Looking for the
first word, we find "if" in front of the subject "anyone." Because
"if" is always a subordinate conjunction, we know both that "if" is the
first word of the clause and that the clause is subordinate.
To make sure that it is
subordinate, we need to find a word (outside of where we would place the
brackets) that this clause "chunks to." Clearly, that word is "asked,"
since the "if" clause answers the question "asked what?" And, since the
"if" clause answers the question "what" after a verb, we know that the
clause has to be the complement of the verb.
What kind of subordinate
clause is it? The "if" clause does not describe the subject ("teacher"),
so it cannot be a predicate adjective. Likewise, it is not "equal" to the
teacher, so it cannot be a predicate noun. Nor does the clause indicate
"to" or "for" whom the teacher asked (as would the word "class" if the
sentence had been "The teacher asked the class if anyone . . . ." Thus
the clause is not an indirect object. The only possibility left is direct
object. |
The teacherasked[DO
of "asked"
if anyonecould
tell her[DO
of "could tell" what
itwas.]] |
We have one pattern left (teacher asked
...), which means that we can simply put a vertical line after the sentence. |
The teacherasked[DO
of "asked"
if anyonecould
tell her[DO
of "could tell" what
itwas.]]/ |
Sentence #4
The fourth sentence is: |
Susie raised
her hand
(DO), stood
tall, and quoted, "Thoushall
not take the covers
(DO)(off
the neighbor's wife)." |
Here again, because there is more than one
S/V/C pattern, we need to start with the last one and work backwards.
The verb in the last pattern is "shall take." The complement is "covers."
To find the last word in this clause, we need to look at the prepositional
phrase, "off the neighbor's wife." Does this phrase meaningfully go with
"shall not take the covers," or does it go back to some word before the
subject "Thou"? Obviously it goes with "shall not take the covers." Thus
the "shall take" clause ends with the word "wife."
To find the first
word in this clause, we need to look at the word before the subject
"Thou." Once you do that, you should see not only that "quoted" is part
of a different pattern, but also that the "shall take" clause is the complement
of "quoted." (It answers the question "Quoted what?")
What type of complement
is the "shall take" clause? It is clearly not a predicate adjective
because it does not describe the subject of "quoted" ("Susie"). Nor is
it equal in any way to "Susie," so it is not a predicate noun. Because
it does not tell "to" or "for" whom Susie quoted, it is not an indirect
object. The only choice left is direct object. |
Susie raised
her hand
(DO), stood
tall, and quoted, [DO
of "quoted" "Thoushall
not take the covers
(DO)(off
the neighbor's wife)."] |
Finished with the "shall take" clause, we move
(backward) to find that we have only one pattern left. Note that
although it has three finite verbs, they all share the same subject, so
they are all part of the same pattern. This means that we have one pattern
that begins with "Susie" and ends with "wife." That is the main clause,
so all we need to do is to put a vertical line after it. We're done. |
Susie raised
her hand
(DO), stood
tall, and quoted, [DO
of "quoted" "Thoushall
not take the covers
(DO)(off
the neighbor's wife)."]/ |
|